When Nature Calls
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Nature Calls
2012
RDirector
Todd Rohal
Runtime
79 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Polar-opposite brothers Randy and Kirk never saw eye-to-eye, but their rivalry is taken to a new level when Randy hijacks Kirk's son's sleepover, taking the boys on a Scout Trip to remember.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.9/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses exclusively on heteronormative male dynamics. There is no presence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The story centers on male bonding and the comedic incompetence of its protagonists. It fails to provide meaningful female agency or diverse gender perspectives.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The production features a predominantly white cast. The narrative does not actively challenge or disrupt Anglo-Saxon centricity.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film adheres to conventional Western comedic tropes. Themes are centered on middle-class urbanite experiences, reinforcing traditional social structures.
Disability Representation
There is no visible or invisible disability representation. Characters are defined by physical competence regarding wilderness survival rather than specific disabilities.
Strengths
- The film subverts 'competent masculine leadership' by portraying its male protagonists as inept in survival contexts.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks meaningful female agency and diverse gender perspectives.
- The cast is overwhelmingly white and lacks significant minority agency.
- There is no representation of neurodivergent or physical disabilities within the character arcs.
- The narrative fails to engage with non-Western or anti-capitalist critiques.
AI Analysis
Nature Calls is a traditional comedy that relies on established social archetypes rather than intersectional storytelling. The narrative architecture reinforces a standard, homogeneous demographic profile through its focus on conventional slapstick and situational humor. The film lacks the intentionality required to move beyond traditionalism. It functions within a standard heteronormative framework, prioritizing male-centric storytelling over diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the production maintains a narrow scope, focusing on middle-class urbanite experiences and a predominantly white cast.
Similar Movies
Brother Nature
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Man Camp
2019
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Father Son Therapy
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.9 out of 10
Scout Toujours
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Clifford
1994
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
House Broken
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
Gorp
1980
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Legacy of a Whitetail Deer Hunter
2018
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.7 out of 10
The Stag
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.1 out of 10
Escanaba in da Moonlight
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.4 out of 10
Buddymoon
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.