You are here:
The Rocket List

The Rocket List

2015

PG-13

Director

Akash Sherman

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

More than a year has passed since the world found out about Ceres II, a dwarf planet on a clean course to devastate earth. The initial chaos that ensued has diminished; in the final weeks leading up to impact, people everywhere are trying to live normal everyday lives just one last time. Four friends use their final days to fulfill their bucket lists and document it in hopes of preserving a time capsule they call the "Rocket List". The plan is to fire off their documentary into outer space before impact in hopes that one day someone will find it.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.3/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks explicit mention of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. There is no evidence of narratives addressing heteronormativity within the available character descriptions.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story centers on four friends, allowing for a balanced distribution of agency. While specific genders are not detailed, the focus on personal bucket lists suggests individual autonomy over traditional roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The global scope of the planetary extinction event implies a universal human experience. However, there is no explicit evidence of intentional intersectional casting to confirm racial diversity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative deconstructs societal permanence by focusing on personal fulfillment during the world's final weeks. This prioritizes individual truth over the stability of traditional Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the inclusion of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities in this production.

Strengths

  • The narrative disrupts conventional disaster cinema by centering on personal, subjective experiences rather than institutional survival.
  • The focus on individual autonomy and bucket lists offers a critique of traditional Western societal structures.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks verifiable data regarding specific character identities, such as race, gender, or sexual orientation.
  • There is no evidence of representation for characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film functions as an existential drama that uses a science fiction premise to explore human agency during systemic collapse. It avoids the typical disaster cinema tropes of institutional heroism, focusing instead on the documentation of subjective experiences. By framing the apocalypse through personal bucket lists rather than organized social preservation, the story critiques the utility of traditional structures. This shift toward moral relativism provides a unique thematic lens. Ultimately, the film remains a mid-range entry regarding representation. While it explores post-structuralist themes, it lacks the verifiable character data needed to be considered a model of intersectional diversity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.