You are here:

A Perfect Enemy

A Perfect Enemy

Representation Score

4.7/10

Fair

2021

Director

Kike Maíllo

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

A Perfect Enemy functions as a psychological puzzle box that prioritizes genre tension over social representation. The narrative focuses on intellectual maneuvering and suspense rather than the inclusion of diverse identities. While the film explores the decay of social order and moral relativism, it remains within the bounds of traditional thriller storytelling. It lacks the intentionality in casting and narrative design needed to challenge social hierarchies. Ultimately, the work operates within a conventional framework that favors a homogeneous demographic, leaving most categories of characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity largely unaddressed.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does A Perfect Enemy have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film lacks prominent LGBTQ+ characters or perspectives that reflect non-straight relationships. The narrative focuses strictly on the psychological interactions between central figures without incorporating queer viewpoints.

How does A Perfect Enemy portray gender?

Fair

Gender distribution is relatively balanced, yet the power dynamics rely on traditional thriller clichés. The film does not explicitly challenge male leadership or use femininity for subversion.

How racially and ethnically diverse is A Perfect Enemy?

Limited

The cast and setting reflect a homogeneous, affluent, Western-centric demographic. There is no evidence of color-blind casting or intentional blending of diverse racial identities.

How does A Perfect Enemy represent religion and culture?

Fair

The story engages with moral relativism and situational ethics within a locked-room scenario. The high-tech setting also serves as a subtle critique of wealthy isolation and capitalist decadence.

Does A Perfect Enemy include disability representation?

Minimal

Characters are defined by psychological resilience and secrets rather than neurodivergence or physical disabilities. There is no significant evidence of visible or invisible disabilities being integrated.

Present on Screen

  • The film successfully disrupts conventional moral certainties through its exploration of situational ethics.
  • The setting provides a subtle critique of the decadence and isolation found within wealthy social structures.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks intentionality in casting diverse racial identities or utilizing color-blind casting.
  • The film fails to integrate neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or LGBTQ+ perspectives into its character studies.
  • Gender roles are tied to traditional clichés rather than subverting systemic power dynamics.

Official Synopsis

Famed architect Jeremy Angust is approached on his trip to the Paris Airport by a chatty girl named Texel Textor who needs a ride. He obliges and after they part ways at the airport entrance, he misses his flight. As he settles in the lounge, he encounters the mysterious young Texel again, who insists on telling her strange story — and the conversation grows stranger and more twisted until it turns sinister and deadly.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.