You are here:

So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM

Name: So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM
Director: Christopher Bird, Kevin Brownlow
Released: 2004
Duration: 38 min

Representation Score

3.5/10

Limited

2004

Director

Christopher Bird, Kevin Brownlow

Runtime

38 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

This documentary provides a detailed look at the professional life of Buster Keaton within the context of the early 20th-century film industry. Its focus on historical accuracy means it does not incorporate modern sociopolitical themes or diverse perspectives. The film adheres closely to the historical record, emphasizing the preservation of cinematic history and individual legacies. This results in a limited exploration of social hierarchies or contemporary issues. Overall, the film reflects the homogeneity of the MGM era, leading to a low diversity score that aligns with its historical subject matter.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories. It focuses on Buster Keaton's career and the workings of the MGM studio during the early 20th century.

How does So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM portray gender?

Limited

The film centers on the male-dominated studio system of the early 20th century. It looks at the professional struggles faced by men without highlighting the roles of women.

How racially and ethnically diverse is So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM?

Limited

The documentary covers a time in Hollywood history when there was little racial diversity. It does not feature characters of color who play significant roles in the story.

How does So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores the conflict between an individual artist and a large corporate entity. It serves as a historical record of the early days of the Hollywood studio system.

Does So Funny It Hurt: Buster Keaton & MGM include disability representation?

Minimal

The documentary does not portray anyone with disabilities. Any physical challenges mentioned are related to the demands of performing in silent films.

Present on Screen

Offers a scholarly and thorough look at silent cinema history through the eyes of a respected film historian.
Provides insights into the institutional workings and pressures of the early Hollywood studio system.

Limited or Absent

Could benefit from incorporating contemporary multi-layered frameworks and diverse viewpoints.
Should consider giving characters of color and diverse identities more prominent roles in the historical narrative.

Official Synopsis

A Turner Classic Movies (TCM) documentary about Keaton's discontented relationship with MGM and the events that eventually led to his career downfall.

How are these scores produced? →