You are here:

Blague dans le coin

Blague dans le coin

Representation Score

1.1/10

Minimal

1963

Director

Maurice Labro

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Maurice Labro’s comedy is a product of its era, focusing on light-hearted entertainment rather than social critique. The film centers on comedic errors and gambling rivalries in Nevada. While the narrative touches on class-based friction, it does not intentionally address identity politics. The production reflects the demographic and social homogeneity typical of mid-century commercial cinema. Ultimately, the film does not aim to disrupt established social hierarchies or provide diverse representation, remaining a culturally specific piece of period entertainment.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Blague dans le coin have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or explore queer relationships. It stays within a traditional framework that assumes everyone is straight.

How does Blague dans le coin portray gender?

Limited

Gender roles in the film follow the social hierarchy of the 1960s without challenging patriarchal structures. Masculinity is shown through authority or comedic incompetence.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Blague dans le coin?

Minimal

The cast and setting are predominantly homogeneous. The narrative does not include diverse racial backgrounds or engage with racial pluralism.

How does Blague dans le coin represent religion and culture?

Fair

The plot includes a moderate critique of class distinctions through working-class characters. However, this is framed as situational humor rather than a deeper critique of systemic issues.

Does Blague dans le coin include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no representation of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters are defined by neurodivergence or physical impairment.

Present on Screen

  • The film provides a moderate critique of class distinctions through its comedic focus on working-class characters.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative lacks racial and ethnic pluralism, maintaining a predominantly homogeneous cast.
  • There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-assuming gender matches what was assigned at birth gender expressions.
  • The film fails to include characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Gender roles remain traditional and do not challenge established patriarchal structures.

Official Synopsis

A Las Perlass, ville de jeu du Névada, bandes rivales de Lippy et de Steinberg tiennent les plus beaux établissements de l'endroit. Franck Bradford has hired Jeff Burlington as a comedian, who, to cheer up a difficult audience, launches nightly verbal attacks on Lippy's casino where, he says - the games are rigged. Each of the two gangs sends a henchman to either stop the sarcasm or get in trouble if they don't leave their act as it is. Un certain "Main d'or" qui est autre que Bradford fait attaquer casinos. C'est Jeff, après avoir été kidnappé par les deux bandes devenues amies, quiasquera coupable.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.