Faces of Death III
1985
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Shocking Asia III: After Dark
1995
Director
Sung-Jiu Kuang, Takafumi Nagamine
Runtime
102 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
"Shocking Asia 3" isn't too outrageous considering its subject matter. This shockumentary is set mostly in Japan
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
2.3/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any indication of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. There is no evidence of depictions involving diverse sexual orientations or gender identities.
Gender Representation
There is no evidence of gendered agency or the subversion of traditional hierarchies. The film focuses on spectacle rather than nuanced character development.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set primarily in Japan, the film offers a non-Western setting. However, the genre often relies on exoticizing foreign locales rather than providing deep, intersectional character agency.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The work leans into transgressive, sensationalist content. It tends to operate through a lens of voyeurism rather than offering a critique of systemic institutions.
Disability Representation
No information is available regarding the portrayal of individuals with physical or neurodivergent disabilities. The film does not address disability representation.
Strengths
- The Japanese setting provides a non-Western, East Asian backdrop that departs from typical Anglo-centric narratives.
Areas for Improvement
- The film lacks meaningful character agency and intersectional depth across all identity categories.
- The reliance on sensationalism and voyeurism prevents nuanced cultural or social critiques.
- There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+, gendered, or disability-focused representation.
AI Analysis
Shocking Asia III: After Dark functions as a shockumentary that prioritizes visceral impact and sensationalism over structured narrative or character depth. Because the film focuses on shock value, it lacks the complex, intersectional storytelling necessary for a high diversity rating. While the Japanese setting provides a departure from Anglo-centric perspectives, the film's approach appears more voyeuristic than empowering. It utilizes a non-Western locale as a backdrop for spectacle rather than exploring meaningful cultural or social nuances. Ultimately, the absence of identifiable LGBTQ+, gendered, or disability-focused narratives results in a low score. The film's primary objective is transgressive impact rather than progressive representation.
Similar Movies
Faces of Death IV
1990
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.5 out of 10
Savage Man Savage Beast
1975
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Path of Darkness: Making 'Silent Hill'
2006
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Texas Chain Saw Massacre: The Shocking Truth
2000
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Worst of Faces of Death
1987
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Faces of Death V
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.2 out of 10
Faces of Death VI
1996
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
The Psycho Legacy
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
Beware the Moon: Remembering 'An American Werewolf in London'
2009
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
Michael Lives: The Making of Halloween
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Faces of Death: Fact or Fiction?
1999
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.