You are here:
Where's the Money

Where's the Money

2017

R

Director

Scott Zabielski

Runtime

86 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A quick witted young man from the streets of South Central must rush a lily-white USC fraternity to recover a stash of stolen money.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The film lacks explicit evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The story focuses primarily on racial and socioeconomic tensions rather than non-heteronormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative centers on a male protagonist within a male-dominated fraternity setting. There is little indication of female agency or the subversion of traditional gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The film centers a protagonist from South Central Los Angeles within a predominantly white USC fraternity. This setup explores racial friction and challenges privileged, homogenous social spaces.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The premise critiques class disparity and the exclusivity of elite collegiate institutions. It uses socioeconomic differences to deconstruct established social strata and systemic inequality.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no information regarding the inclusion of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this production.

Strengths

  • The film centers a protagonist from a marginalized socioeconomic background to challenge institutional homogeneity.
  • The narrative uses racial friction to explore and critique class disparity within elite Western institutions.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and neurodivergent or physical disabilities.
  • The male-dominated fraternity setting limits the exploration of gender diversity and female agency.

AI Analysis

Where's the Money uses a comedic premise to highlight racial and class-based friction. By placing a protagonist from South Central into a privileged USC fraternity, the film creates a narrative engine driven by social and racial tension. However, the film's scope remains narrow. The focus on a male-centric fraternity environment and the lack of visible LGBTQ+ or disability representation limits its intersectional depth. It functions more as a genre-specific comedy than a tool for broad social commentary. Ultimately, while the film successfully disrupts social hierarchies through its central character, it adheres to traditional archetypes that prevent a more diverse or inclusive viewing experience.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.