New Showbiz

You are here:
Temps

Temps

2016

Not Rated

Director

Ryan Sage

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Jefferson is a lovable ski-bum temp worker whose singular joy comes from an annual excursion to the slopes with fellow vagabond/best friend, Curtis. When Jefferson falls for fellow temp worker, Stephanie, an ambitious go-getter, he is forced to re-evaluate his minimum wage, minimum commitment lifestyle.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.2/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The narrative centers on a romantic connection between Jefferson and Stephanie. There is no explicit evidence of queer identities or non-heteronormative storylines within the character descriptions.

Gender Representation

Fair

Stephanie subverts traditional tropes by acting as an ambitious catalyst for change. Her goal-oriented nature forces the male lead to re-evaluate his lifestyle, disrupting passive female archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The cast and synopsis suggest a conventional demographic structure. There is no indication of characters of color occupying high-agency roles or a diverse, non-Anglo-Saxon majority.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques socioeconomic structures by centering on vagabond lifestyles. It explores anti-capitalist sentiments and the rejection of standard, ambition-driven Western success models.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The provided material contains no mention of characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions.

Strengths

  • Subverts gender tropes by positioning the female lead as an ambitious driver of character growth.
  • Offers a thoughtful critique of traditional socioeconomic structures and the Western success model.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible LGBTQ+ agency or representation within the primary character arcs.
  • Shows a lack of racial and ethnic diversity in the cast and narrative framework.

AI Analysis

Temps is a character-driven study of lifestyle choices and socioeconomic rebellion. It finds its strength in deconstructing traditional professional expectations and gendered hierarchies through its protagonist's journey. However, the film lacks significant intersectional breadth. The narrative appears to follow a conventional demographic structure, offering little visibility for LGBTQ+ identities or racial diversity. Ultimately, the film trades broad social representation for a specific critique of the pursuit of stability and traditional career trajectories.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Bottoms Up

Bottoms Up

2006

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.