
The Twelve Months of the Summer
1988

1987
Director
Věra Chytilová
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
In this Czech political allegory-cum-sci-fi adventure, ten teens from different schools find themselves chosen to take part in a special skiing workshop in the mountains. On the day of the seminar, eleven young people, each bearing an invitation, arrive. A massive avalanche occurs and the ski-lodge is cut off from outside contact. Unfortunately, food supplies are limited and the three instructors strongly advise that the youths work together to make do or choose someone to leave. Time passes and soon the kids learn that their “teachers” are not what they seem to be.
Overall Score
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
Specific character identities and interpersonal dynamics remain unconfirmed. However, the film's blend of horror and science fiction often provides a lens to explore non-normative identities.
Gender Representation
The narrative likely dismantles traditional gender roles through survivalist archetypes. Chytilová’s history suggests a critique of patriarchal structures rather than submissive femininity.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The 1987 Czech production and isolated setting suggest a demographic homogeneity. There is no evidence of significant racial or ethnic intersectionality in the narrative.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film uses an isolated camp to critique systemic corruption and institutional authority. It prioritizes psychological survival over traditional communal or familial values.
Disability Representation
There are no details regarding characters with visible or invisible disabilities present in the narrative.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Věra Chytilová’s direction suggests a film focused on the psychological deconstruction of authority and the subversion of social order. The narrative uses an isolated winter resort to explore how systemic control erodes social cohesion among adolescents. While the film lacks demographic variety due to its regional and historical context, it excels in thematic subversion. It replaces traditional social hierarchies with primal power dynamics and psychological archetypes. The work functions more as a critique of institutional stability than a showcase of diverse identities, prioritizing the breakdown of social contracts over representative breadth.
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.