
Young, Single & Angry
2006

2009
Director
Daryl Wein
Runtime
88 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
'Breaking Upwards' explores a young, real-life New York couple who, four years in and battling codependency, decide to intricately strategize their own break up. Based on an actual experiment devised by director/actor Daryl Wein and actress Zoe Lister-Jones, the film loosely interprets a year in their lives exploring alternatives to monogamy, and the madness that ensues. An uncensored look at young love, lust, and the pangs of codependency, 'Breaking Upwards' follows its characters as they navigate each others' emotions across the city they love. It begs the question: is it ever possible to grow apart together?
Overall Score
Good
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film critiques heteronormative structures by exploring alternatives to monogamy. While specific LGBTQ+ characters are not explicitly documented, the focus on fluid intimacy challenges traditional relationship norms.
Gender Representation
Both protagonists demonstrate high agency, avoiding tropes of submissive or dominant roles. They prioritize individual emotional evolution over traditional partnership preservation through a shared, strategic negotiation.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative leans toward a localized, urban demographic. There is insufficient evidence of significant racial or ethnic intersectionality within the central cast or story.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story aligns with postmodern values by prioritizing subjective morality over traditional institutional commitments. It frames the deconstruction of the nuclear unit as a form of personal liberation.
Disability Representation
The film explores psychological complexities like codependency, but lacks evidence of specific physical or neurodivergent disabilities as central plot drivers.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Breaking Upwards succeeds as a narrative experiment that subverts traditional romantic hierarchies. By centering the plot on the intentional deconstruction of monogamy, it offers a progressive look at modern intimacy and individual agency. However, the film lacks breadth in its demographic representation. The focus remains heavily on a specific urban lens, resulting in a lack of racial intersectionality and visible disability representation. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its intellectual challenge to social norms rather than its breadth of diverse identities.

2006

2010

1998

2020

2014

2002

2021

2005

2021

2021

2004

2012
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.