You are here:
Double Jeopardy

Double Jeopardy

1996

R

Director

Deborah Dalton

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A naive 16 year old waitress falls for a corrupt, married police officer. When she falls pregnant, her lover plots her murder.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The story centers on a heterosexual romantic entanglement. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that critique heteronormativity.

Gender Representation

Fair

The plot follows a female protagonist navigating a predatory power dynamic. It utilizes traditional victim and villain tropes common in 1990s suspense dramas.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

While Joe Penny is part of the cast, the narrative details lack sufficient information regarding the racial composition of the ensemble.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

The film operates within traditional Western crime tropes. It focuses on individual morality rather than a broader deconstruction of Western institutions.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The documentation contains no mention of neurodivergence, physical disabilities, or mental health conditions.

Strengths

  • The narrative provides a central female protagonist navigating complex power dynamics.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on conventional 1990s suspense tropes rather than subverting social hierarchies.
  • There is a lack of representation for LGBTQ+ identities and disability.
  • The story lacks depth regarding racial diversity and systemic cultural critiques.

AI Analysis

Double Jeopardy functions primarily as a genre-driven crime drama focused on interpersonal conflict. The narrative prioritizes high-stakes suspense and melodrama over progressive social commentary or intersectional character studies. The film adheres to mid-90s television mystery conventions. It centers on a specific betrayal involving a corrupt officer and a naive waitress, leaning into established tropes of gendered peril rather than subverting social hierarchies. Ultimately, the production lacks the intentionality required to disrupt traditional structures. It remains a localized critique of individual corruption rather than a systemic exploration of identity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.