You are here:

Under the Flag of the Rising Sun

Under the Flag of the Rising Sun

Representation Score

5.6/10

Fair

1972

Director

Kinji Fukasaku

Runtime

96 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Kinji Fukasaku’s work deconstructs traditional heroism by focusing on institutional corruption and the fallibility of official history. The film replaces the 'heroic war' cliché with a woman's struggle against a bureaucratic machine that has erased her husband's legacy. The narrative structure prioritizes a critique of state power. By presenting four conflicting accounts of a single event, the film suggests that truth is subjective and shaped by individual perspective rather than state-sanctioned records. While the film excels in gender empowerment and cultural critique, it remains ethnically uniform and lacks visible LGBTQ+ or disability representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Under the Flag of the Rising Sun have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not explicitly mention LGBTQ+ characters or non-straight relationships. The narrative focuses on traditional marriage and widowhood roles.

How does Under the Flag of the Rising Sun portray gender?

Good

A woman leads as the main investigator, challenging traditional hierarchies. She shows intellectual persistence and plays a key role in driving the story against male-dominated institutions.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Under the Flag of the Rising Sun?

Fair

The cast is ethnically uniform, reflecting a Japanese perspective on domestic military history. It avoids a Western lens by centering a non-Western viewpoint on war trauma.

How does Under the Flag of the Rising Sun represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The story critiques state institutions and promotes moral relativism through conflicting testimonies. It portrays the state as an oppressive, bureaucratic entity that denies individual justice.

Does Under the Flag of the Rising Sun include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no specific details regarding physical or neurodivergent representation in the provided context.

Present on Screen

  • Places a woman in a position of investigative leadership, challenging traditional gender roles.
  • Offers a sophisticated critique of systemic authority and institutional corruption.
  • Uses subjective storytelling to challenge the sanctity of official historical records.

Limited or Absent

  • Does not include explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight relationships.
  • Features an ethnically uniform cast typical of domestic historical dramas.
  • Provides no information regarding disability or neurodivergent representation.

Official Synopsis

A war widow determined to clear the name of her disgraced husband, who was court-martialed for desertion and executed. Official records have been destroyed, and the ministry that distributes benefits continues to deny her a pension. Twenty-six years after the war, she seeks out four survivors of her husband's garrison. Each tells a dramatically different story about her husband's conduct, but she is determined to learn the truth.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.