One and Not Done
2017
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.2 out of 10
You are here:
Survive and Advance
Representation Score
0.8/10
Minimal
2013
TV-GDirector
Jonathan Hock
Runtime
90 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Survive and Advance is a specialized biographical documentary that prioritizes historical athletic achievement over social commentary. Its narrow scope is dictated by its subject matter: the 1983 NC State Wolfpack basketball team. The film adheres to conventional narrative structures, emphasizing meritocracy and the underdog cliché. Because it chronicles a specific sporting milestone, it lacks the intentionality required to engage with progressive social representation or deconstruct hierarchies. Ultimately, the work reinforces traditional values of discipline and institutional participation. It functions as a localized study of perseverance rather than an exploration of multi-layered identity.
Category Breakdown
Does Survive and Advance have LGBTQ+ representation?
There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisgender identities in the film. The story focuses solely on the athletic journey and interpersonal dynamics of a male collegiate basketball team.
How does Survive and Advance portray gender?
The narrative centers on a male-dominated environment, reinforcing traditional masculine archetypes of strength and leadership. Character development is explored through the lens of traditional masculine achievement.
How racially and ethnically diverse is Survive and Advance?
The roster includes players of different races reflecting the demographics of 1983. However, the narrative focuses on shared athletic objectives rather than multi-layered identity politics.
How does Survive and Advance represent religion and culture?
The film celebrates triumph within traditional Western institutional structures like collegiate athletics. It promotes themes of discipline and institutional pride without offering social critiques.
Does Survive and Advance include disability representation?
The documentary focuses on elite physical performance and athletic capability. There is no visible or invisible disability representation within the narrative.
Present on Screen
- Provides a focused, authentic chronicle of a specific historical sporting milestone.
- Effectively utilizes the underdog cliché to build a narrative of collective grit and perseverance.
Limited or Absent
- Lacks engagement with diverse social hierarchies or identity-based political frameworks.
- Reinforces traditional masculine archetypes and narrow institutional values throughout the narrative.
Official Synopsis
Documentary exploring the 1983 North Carolina State Wolfpack men's basketball team's success after being the underdogs in the competitions.
Where to Watch
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select or search, Escape to close.
Similar Movies
Stephen Curry: Underrated
2023
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.3 out of 10
Saved for a Reason
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.2 out of 10
Murderball
2005
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 5.5 out of 10
Phi Slama Jama
2016
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 2.6 out of 10
The Class of ‘92
2013
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 0.2 out of 10
Requiem for the Big East
2014
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 6.5 out of 10
The Redeem Team
2022
No user ratings available yet
Representation score: 3.1 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.