
How to Be Single
2016

2018
PGDirector
Ken Marino
Runtime
112 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Elizabeth, a charming morning show news anchor, seeks advice from her dog's therapist after a breakup. Tara, a spunky barista, dreams of a life beyond the coffee shop. Awkward Garrett pines for Tara while trying to keep his adopt-a-dog business afloat. Dax is a man-child and leader of the aspiring rock band Frunk. Grace and Kurt anxiously await the arrival of their adoptive daughter, Amelia. Walter, an aging, lonely widower, loses his dog Mabel when she runs off. The beloved canines in their lives soon start to influence their careers, friendships, and romantic relationships in funny and unexpected ways.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks prominent LGBTQ+ narratives or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative focus remains centered on heteronormative romantic struggles and traditional relationship dynamics.
Gender Representation
The film disrupts the 'perfect' nuclear family trope by highlighting the flaws and anxieties of its leads. However, it relies on traditional archetypes like the charming female professional.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The ensemble cast presents a moderate level of demographic variety typical of a contemporary suburb. It avoids a monolithic white perspective but does not prioritize characters of color as primary drivers.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story frames characters through situational ethics and selfish impulses rather than a singular moral compass. It portrays traditional institutions like marriage as sources of anxiety and dysfunction.
Disability Representation
There is no significant evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities possessing narrative agency. The focus remains on neurotypical emotional crises and romantic dynamics.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Dog Days functions as a standard ensemble dramedy that explores suburban dysfunction through flawed, morally ambiguous characters. While it avoids the rigid tropes of idealized domesticity, it lacks the intentionality needed to disrupt social hierarchies. The film's strength lies in its nuanced portrayal of domestic dissatisfaction. By showcasing the infidelities and personal anxieties of its characters, it provides a more realistic look at middle-class life than typical family comedies. However, the film struggles with representation across several key areas. It relies heavily on heteronormative structures and traditional gender archetypes, while failing to include characters with disabilities or significant queer agency.

2016

2022

2017

2019

2019

2018

2007

2011

1993

2015

2000

2008
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.