You are here:

(T)ERROR

(T)ERROR

Representation Score

3.9/10

Limited

2015

Director

David Felix Sutcliffe, Lyric R. Cabral

Runtime

93 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

*(T)ERROR* succeeds in complicating Western-centric views of security by centering diverse ethnic and religious perspectives. By juxtaposing a government informant with a radicalized target, the film provides a sophisticated look at the mechanics of extremism and state surveillance. While the documentary offers significant depth regarding Middle Eastern and Muslim identities, it lacks representation for LGBTQ+ and disability narratives. The focus remains heavily on the sociological and geopolitical aspects of the subject matter. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its ability to deconstruct how systemic forces and radical ideologies intersect, moving beyond flat portrayals of religious identity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does (T)ERROR have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The documentary focuses solely on the geopolitical and psychological aspects of religious extremism, with no presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives.

How does (T)ERROR portray gender?

Fair

The film examines how extremist ideologies use gender roles to maintain organizational structures. Propaganda assigns specific functions to men and women, but individual ability to act remains secondary to sociological utility.

How racially and ethnically diverse is (T)ERROR?

Good

The narrative centers on Middle Eastern and Western Muslim identities, providing depth to voices often sidelined in mainstream media. It explores the intersection of ethnic identity and digital connectivity without relying on simple clichés.

How does (T)ERROR represent religion and culture?

Good

The film engages with anti-Western and anti-capitalist rhetoric to study how extremist ideologies gain traction. It highlights the tension between individual identity and systemic geopolitical pressures.

Does (T)ERROR include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no specific depictions of visible or invisible disabilities that serve as central narrative elements within the documentary.

Present on Screen

  • Provides significant depth to Middle Eastern and Western Muslim identities.
  • Avoids simple clichés by exploring complex intersections of ethnicity and digital connectivity.
  • Offers a nuanced examination of how extremist propaganda utilizes gender roles.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks any discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives.
  • Does not include depictions of visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Focuses more on the sociological utility of gender than on individual character's ability to drive the story.

Official Synopsis

This real-life look at FBI counterterrorism operations features access to both sides of a sting: the government informant and the radicalized target.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.