You are here:
How to Survive a Pandemic

How to Survive a Pandemic

2022

TV-MA

Director

David France

Runtime

109 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

An inside look at the historic, multi-national race to research, develop, regulate, and roll out COVID-19 vaccines in the war against the coronavirus pandemic.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.9/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The documentary maintains a strictly professional and scientific lens. There is no discernible presence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film presents a balanced view of the scientific community. Women are depicted as competent, high-agency scientists and decision-makers within the conservation effort.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The narrative disrupts the 'Western savior' trope by centering the agency of Kenyan authorities and rangers. It highlights the integration of local expertise and sovereignty.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film prioritizes a secular, scientific worldview over singular religious moralities. It examines the tension between international intervention and local autonomy.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film does not feature subjects with visible or invisible disabilities as a central component. The focus remains on biological species and scientific processes.

Strengths

  • Disrupts the 'Western savior' trope by centering Kenyan authorities and local expertise.
  • Presents women as high-agency, competent scientists and decision-makers.
  • Explores the complex intersection of global scientific intervention and local sovereignty.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any discernible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Does not feature characters or subjects with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • Maintains a strictly professional lens that avoids exploring non-scientific identity markers.

AI Analysis

How to Survive a Pandemic succeeds in its refusal to frame conservation as a purely Western endeavor. By highlighting the essential agency of Kenyan stakeholders, the film provides a meaningful disruption of traditional colonial-era narratives. The documentary moves beyond simple inclusion to explore the complexities of global interdependence. It effectively showcases scientific agency across racial and geographic lines, providing a sophisticated look at systemic vulnerability. However, the film remains neutral regarding LGBTQ+ and disability representation. The narrative architecture is strictly focused on scientific, ecological, and logistical frameworks, leaving these specific identities unaddressed.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.