You are here:
Six O'Clock in the Evening After the War

Six O'Clock in the Evening After the War

1944

Approved

Director

Ivan Pyryev

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Designed as a successor to "They Met In Moscow", with the same director, star and composer, "Six P. M." (1946 American release title) has two artillery officers meeting an attractive girl in Moscow between battles. One falls in love with her and they vow to meet in Moscow on a bridge at Six P.M. when the war ends. The war puts them on diverse trails, but the pledge is fulfilled against a setting of Moscow's famous fireworks displays.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.3/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to traditional heteronormative social structures. There is no evidence of queer narratives or non-heteronormative identities within the story.

Gender Representation

Fair

A female protagonist serves as a central focal point for the male leads. However, power dynamics favor the male artillery officers who drive the plot.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The casting reflects a homogeneous Slavic demographic typical of Soviet productions of this era. The narrative remains focused on a Moscow-centric setting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The film emphasizes patriotism and state-aligned milestones like Moscow's fireworks. It reinforces the military and the state as primary drivers of stability.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence regarding the portrayal of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in this work.

Strengths

  • The film provides a strong sense of national cohesion and patriotic fervor.
  • It features a central female protagonist who provides a romantic focal point for the narrative.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks intersectional complexity and multi-ethnic casting.
  • Gender dynamics favor male military officers over female agency.
  • The story adheres strictly to traditional heteronormative social structures.

AI Analysis

Ivan Pyryev’s film serves as a quintessential example of mid-century nationalist cinema. It is designed to bolster national morale through optimistic, large-scale narratives that prioritize collective emotional experiences over individual complexity. The story reinforces traditional social hierarchies and a singular, unified cultural identity. While effective for its historical purpose of fostering patriotism, it lacks the intersectional depth found in more progressive media. Ultimately, the film functions as a tool for national cohesion, centering on romantic archetypes and state-sanctioned values rather than exploring marginalized identities or challenging existing power structures.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.