You are here:

The Fourth Wise Man

Name: The Fourth Wise Man
Director: Michael Ray Rhodes
Released: 1985
Duration: 72 min

1985

TV-PG

Director

Michael Ray Rhodes

Runtime

72 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Artaban is a young Magus (Wise Man) who desires to follow the star to the birthplace of the coming King, against the counsel of his friends and family. Carrying three precious jewels to give to the baby Messiah, Artaban and his reluctant servant Orontes set off to join the caravan of the three other wise men. They miss the caravan, but Artaban continues the search for his King, always one step behind. Artaban spends much of his remaining wealth and all of his energy helping the poor and unfortunate people he meets, until at the end of his life he finally finds Jesus--at His trial! Has Artaban wasted his life in a foolish quest? Will he ever get the chance to present his gifts to the King?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.6/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film focuses on a singular, heteronormative religious quest. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy within the narrative.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story is driven by a male protagonist and his male servant. The lack of female agency suggests a traditional gender hierarchy centered on masculine endeavors.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The Middle Eastern setting provides an inherently multicultural backdrop. However, the representation follows standard historical tropes rather than modern intersectional casting.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Minimal

The plot reinforces traditional Christian morality and religious devotion. It centers on the pursuit of a Messiah, upholding established religious ideals.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The narrative contains no mention of characters navigating physical, neurodivergent, or mental health conditions.

Strengths

The Middle Eastern setting provides a naturally multicultural historical backdrop.

Areas for Improvement

The narrative lacks female agency and positions women outside the central quest.
There is a notable absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
The film reinforces singular religious ideals rather than exploring diverse cultural perspectives.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a traditional period drama that prioritizes historical and religious fidelity. The narrative architecture reinforces established social and religious hierarchies rather than challenging them. While the setting is naturally multicultural due to its historical context, the storytelling remains focused on a singular religious mission. This results in a lack of diverse perspectives or marginalized identities. Ultimately, the work serves as a classic example of storytelling that upholds traditional institutional values and conventional tropes.

How are these scores produced? →