You are here:
The Big Trip

The Big Trip

2019

G

Director

Natalya Nilova, Vasily Rovensky

Runtime

84 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A goofy stork mistakenly delivers a baby panda to the wrong door. A bear, a moose, a tiger and a rabbit set on an arduous but fun-filled adventure through the wilderness to return the panda to its rightful home.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.9/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks any representation of non-cisnormative gender identities. The narrative focuses on traditional adventure tropes involving animal characters.

Gender Representation

Fair

The primary traveling party consists of male-coded animals like a bear, moose, tiger, and rabbit. This reliance on conventional archetypes results in a lack of female leadership.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

Diversity is expressed through a variety of animal species, including a panda and tiger. However, the film does not engage in intentional deconstruction of ethnic tropes.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story reinforces traditional communal values and familial belonging through a restorative arc. It avoids socio-political critiques in favor of preserving the natural order.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no indication of characters navigating physical, sensory, or neurodivergent experiences. The characters operate within standard physical capacities for an adventure plot.

Strengths

  • The use of diverse animal species like pandas and tigers provides a sense of character variety.
  • The narrative promotes positive themes of responsibility and familial belonging.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film relies on male-coded animal archetypes, lacking female leadership in the main group.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or neurodivergent character experiences.
  • The story follows traditional tropes without engaging in deeper cultural or social critiques.

AI Analysis

The Big Trip follows a standard family adventure structure that prioritizes genre conventions over social subversion. The narrative centers on a group of male-coded animals on a quest to return a lost panda, which reinforces traditional archetypes rather than challenging them. While the use of diverse animal species provides a soft metaphor for character variety, the film lacks depth in intersectional representation. There is no evidence of LGBTQ+ identities or disability representation within the story. Ultimately, the film functions as a conventional piece of animation. It emphasizes themes of responsibility and familial stability, adhering to traditional values rather than exploring complex cultural or social hierarchies.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.