New Showbiz

You are here:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 75 Years Later

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 75 Years Later

2020

TV-14

Director

James Erskine

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Hiroshima and Nagasaki: 75 Years Later is told entirely from the first-person perspective of leaders, physicists, soldiers and survivors.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.4/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film focuses on historical and humanitarian realities rather than LGBTQ+ identities. While no specific queer narratives are featured, the documentary contains no derogatory content.

Gender Representation

Fair

The narrative disrupts traditional military tropes by centering the domestic and biological experiences of women. It highlights the specific vulnerabilities and long-term survival struggles faced by female victims.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The documentary excels by utilizing first-person testimonies from Japanese survivors and descendants. This shifts agency from Western decision-makers to the victims, ensuring they are active narrators of their own history.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Excellent

The film provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutional power and military intervention. It uses a post-colonial lens to examine the power dynamics between a global superpower and the Japanese populace.

Disability Representation

Good

Significant visibility is given to both visible and invisible disabilities caused by radiation. The film treats chronic illness and physical impairments with dignity, centering these struggles as core historical components.

Strengths

  • Prioritizes non-Western perspectives by centering Japanese survivors as active narrators.
  • Disrupts masculine military tropes by highlighting the domestic and biological experiences of women.
  • Treats radiation-induced disabilities and chronic illnesses with dignity and agency.
  • Challenges Western institutional power through a sophisticated post-colonial lens.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives within the historical focus.

AI Analysis

James Erskine’s documentary succeeds by intentionally centering the voices of the hibakusha rather than following a Western-centric military triumph narrative. By prioritizing first-person testimonies from survivors, the film shifts the historical agency to those directly impacted by the atomic bombings. The film's strength lies in its intersectional approach to human suffering. It moves beyond strategic military discussions to include the lived realities of women and the long-term physical consequences of radiation sickness, treating disability with profound agency. While the documentary lacks specific LGBTQ+ representation, it remains a progressive historical document. It effectively deconstructs traditional power hierarchies and challenges the perceived moral superiority of Western military intervention through a humanitarian lens.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Movie poster for Shoah

Shoah

1985

No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 6.4 out of 10
Movie poster for 9/11: Escape from the Towers

9/11: Escape from the Towers

2018

No user ratings available yet
No diversity score available

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.