You are here:

It Wants Blood!

Name: It Wants Blood!
Director: James Balsamo
Released: 2019
Duration: 103 min

Representation Score

3.5/10

Limited

2019

Director

James Balsamo

Runtime

103 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

It Wants Blood! combines satire and political commentary using non-human entities to critique human political systems. The film's strength lies in its metaphorical approach to challenging institutional power. However, the film lacks specific character-driven identity markers. Since the main characters are giant monsters, the narrative doesn't explore explicit racial, gender, or LGBTQ+ identities, leaving demographic representation largely unexplored. Ultimately, the film uses a metaphorical critique of systemic power rather than direct demographic representation. It excels as a political satire but falls short in representing human-centric diversity.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does It Wants Blood! have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film doesn't include clear indicators of LGBTQ+ identities for its characters. The focus on a political battle among non-human entities doesn't provide much room for exploring non-traditional gender identities.

How does It Wants Blood! portray gender?

Fair

The story revolves around a power struggle for a Senate seat between giant monsters. While this metaphorically disrupts typical human leadership roles, there isn't much specific information about gendered characters.

How racially and ethnically diverse is It Wants Blood!?

Limited

The narrative emphasizes the political system's mechanics rather than demographic diversity. There is no indication of a diverse or non-Anglo-Saxon majority cast among the monster characters.

How does It Wants Blood! represent religion and culture?

Good

The film critiques Western political institutions through satire. By presenting a Senate race as a monster battle, it challenges traditional power structures.

Does It Wants Blood! include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no clear depiction of physical or neurodivergent disabilities in the film.

Present on Screen

The satirical framework effectively challenges traditional Western political institutions.
The monster-led premise provides a unique metaphorical space to deconstruct human leadership and systemic power.

Limited or Absent

The reliance on non-human characters leads to a lack of explicit racial and ethnic representation.
The narrative lacks clear markers for LGBTQ+ or gender-specific identities.
There is no visible representation of physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

Official Synopsis

Two giant monsters are forced to battle head to head on the political circuit as they run against each other for a seat in the Senate.

How are these scores produced? →