Find another title
The Odd Angry Shot
1979
Director
Tom Jeffrey
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
A group of Australian SAS regiment soldiers are deployed to Vietnam around 1967/8 and encounter the realities of war, from the numbing boredom of camp life and long range patrols, raids and ambushes where nothing happens, to the the terror of enduring mortar barrages from an unseen enemy. Men die and are crippled in combat by firefights and booby traps, soldiers kill and capture the enemy, gather intelligence and retake ground only to cede it again whilst battling against the bureaucracy and obstinacy of the conventional military hierarchy. In the end they return to civilization, forever changed by their experiences but glad to return to the life they once knew.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on an all-male SAS regiment. There are no depictions of LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities, maintaining a strictly heteronormative military environment.
Gender Representation
Female characters are entirely absent, leaving no room for female agency. The story centers on the psychological friction between male soldiers and a rigid military hierarchy.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative focuses on a homogeneous group of Australian soldiers. While set in Vietnam, the perspective remains centered on the white Australian infantry experience.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The film excels by critiquing Western institutions and the myth of the heroic soldier. It replaces patriotic morality with a gritty, realistic look at systemic absurdity.
Disability Representation
Disability appears through combat injuries and physical trauma from booby traps. These moments serve to illustrate the violence of war rather than exploring nuanced character studies.
Strengths
- Strong critique of Western institutional authority and military bureaucracy.
- Effective use of moral relativism to challenge traditional patriotic tropes.
- Gritty, naturalistic portrayal of the psychological toll of combat.
Areas for Improvement
- Lack of female characters and gender diversity.
- Homogeneous racial casting limits the scope of the narrative.
- Absence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.
AI Analysis
The film is a study in contradictions, offering profound cultural subversion alongside a very narrow demographic scope. It succeeds as a critique of institutional authority and the dehumanizing nature of bureaucracy, moving away from traditional heroic war tropes. However, the lack of gender, racial, and LGBTQ+ diversity keeps the overall score low. The ensemble is almost entirely homogeneous, reflecting the casting norms of 1979 and the specific focus on a singular military unit. Ultimately, the film is a postmodern deconstruction of the soldier myth. It trades patriotic idealism for psychological realism, even if it does so within a limited social framework.
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.