You are here:

Clear and Present Danger

Clear and Present Danger

Representation Score

2.6/10

Limited

1994

PG-13

Director

Phillip Noyce

Runtime

141 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Clear and Present Danger is a classic geopolitical thriller that prioritizes a critique of institutional corruption over broad demographic representation. The film's strength lies in its thematic deconstruction of state authority and the systemic issues within intelligence agencies. However, this intellectual complexity is not matched by diverse character archetypes. The film relies on traditional hierarchies, featuring a predominantly white, male cast and limited ability to act for female characters.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Clear and Present Danger have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film adheres to a traditional framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender. It does not include LGBTQ+ characters or explore non-cisgender identities.

How does Clear and Present Danger portray gender?

Fair

Male protagonists dominate the narrative, reinforcing traditional masculine leadership. Female characters have professional roles but are primarily defined by their relationships to the male-driven plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Clear and Present Danger?

Limited

The cast focuses on white male protagonists, reflecting the demographics of the era's intelligence community. Colombian characters appear but are often defined by their connection to the central conflict rather than through nuanced development.

How does Clear and Present Danger represent religion and culture?

Good

The film provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutions, portraying high-level officials as architects of a 'dirty war.' This challenges the assumption of inherent institutional morality.

Does Clear and Present Danger include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities. No characters are defined by disability traits that drive the narrative.

Present on Screen

  • Provides a sophisticated critique of Western institutional integrity and state-sanctioned corruption.
  • Offers a nuanced exploration of the tension between individual ethics and institutional mandates.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks significant representation across gender, race, and sexual orientation.
  • Relies on traditional gender hierarchies and male-centric leadership models.
  • Fails to provide nuanced character development for non-white characters.

Official Synopsis

Agent Jack Ryan becomes acting Deputy Director of Intelligence for the CIA when Admiral Greer is diagnosed with cancer. When an American businessman, and friend of the president, is murdered on his yacht, Ryan starts discovering links between the man and drug dealers. As former CIA agent John Clark is sent to Colombia to kill drug cartel kingpins in retaliation, Ryan must fight through multiple cover-ups to figure out what happened and who's responsible.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.