New Showbiz

You are here:
The One

The One

2022

Director

Dmitriy Suvorov

Runtime

108 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

On August 24, 1981, the newlyweds Larisa and Vladimir Savitsky stepped on board the plane following the flight Komsomolsk-on-Amur - Blagoveshchensk. 30 minutes before landing, the civilian aircraft AN-24 collided with another aircraft and broke into pieces at an altitude of more than 5 kilometers above the ground. No one was supposed to survive ... but a miracle happened. Larisa Savitskaya woke up in the middle of the wreckage of the plane in the impenetrable taiga. Now she herself had to create a real miracle, which only a strong-minded person is capable of.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.8/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The story focuses on a traditional heterosexual marriage between Larisa and Vladimir. There are no visible queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities within the plot.

Gender Representation

Fair

Larisa breaks survival tropes by serving as the primary driver of the plot. Her struggle in the taiga emphasizes physical and intellectual autonomy over passive archetypes.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

Set in 1981 Soviet Union, the film uses a localized cast reflecting the era's demographics. It does not attempt to diversify the cast or challenge historical norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The film is rooted in a specific Soviet historical reality. It focuses on human endurance rather than critiquing systemic power or promoting specific religious or secular ideologies.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The protagonist faces intense physical and psychological trauma from the crash. However, it is unclear if the film treats disability through an agentic lens or merely as a plot device.

Strengths

  • The film provides strong narrative agency to a female lead in a high-stakes environment.
  • Larisa's character emphasizes intellectual and physical autonomy over traditional feminine archetypes.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative characters.
  • The cast and setting adhere strictly to historical norms without seeking intersectional diversity.
  • There is no clear exploration of disability through an agentic or meaningful lens.

AI Analysis

The film operates as a localized survival drama centered on individual resilience. While it avoids many Western narrative tropes, it remains tethered to the demographic realities of its 1981 Soviet setting. The most significant strength is the subversion of gender roles, placing agency in a female protagonist's hands during a high-stakes survival scenario. This moves the character beyond traditional passive roles. However, the narrative lacks intersectional complexity. It adheres to conventional historical frameworks and lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities or intentional racial diversity, resulting in a narrow social scope.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.