Grand Canyonscope
1954
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Legend of Coyote Rock
1945
NRDirector
Charles August Nichols
Runtime
7 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Pluto is guarding a flock of sheep in the West; a coyote is sneaking up on that flock. The coyote fakes a bad leg; Pluto chases it away, only to have it run back ahead of him and go after the sheep. Pluto gets back and finds the coyote chasing the lone black sheep of the flock, after trapping the rest. The chase ends with the coyote buried under a toppling spire of rock, which forms a coyote of rock on the top.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.7/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a primal conflict between Pluto and a coyote. There are no depictions of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.
Gender Representation
The story centers on animal characters, bypassing human gender hierarchies. However, the absence of female characters relies on traditional, action-oriented tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
Set in the West, the narrative mirrors colonial frontier tropes. It lacks diverse perspectives, reflecting the homogeneous storytelling standards of 1945.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot reinforces a binary of order versus chaos through a hero-versus-deceiver framework. It avoids systemic critique or cultural deconstruction.
Disability Representation
A coyote uses a fake bad leg as a deceptive tactic. This serves a comedic plot device rather than a meaningful portrayal of disability.
Strengths
- The film successfully utilizes traditional slapstick structures to drive its comedic momentum.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks diverse perspectives and fails to subvert established social or gender hierarchies.
- Physical ailments are used only as deceptive plot devices rather than meaningful character traits.
AI Analysis
This 1945 animation is a product of the Golden Age studio system, prioritizing slapstick comedy over social complexity. The narrative relies on a binary conflict between a protector and a predator, which avoids any meaningful engagement with intersectional identities. The film's setting and character dynamics reflect the era's standard Western tropes. While the animal protagonists bypass human gender hierarchies, the lack of diverse casting or nuanced social dynamics results in a very narrow storytelling scope. Ultimately, the work functions as a straightforward morality tale. It uses physical ailments and frontier settings as mere tools for comedy rather than as opportunities for representation.
Similar Movies
The Simple Things
1953
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Bone Bandit
1948
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
Puss Cafe
1950
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Chaser on the Rocks
1965
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
The Duck Hunt
1932
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.8 out of 10
Daffy Duck and the Dinosaur
1939
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
The Painter and the Pointer
1944
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.4 out of 10
Winter Storage
1949
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
The Fox Hunt
1931
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
Hold the Lion, Please
1942
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.3 out of 10
Nice Doggy
1952
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.