
Soul to Keep
2018

2007
RDirector
Michael Penning
Runtime
72 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Kayla and Jesse loved spending their childhood summers at their grandfather's secluded cottage in the pristine mountains of rural New England. Now, fifteen years since their last visit, the sisters return along with Kayla's boyfriend Dean and his best-friend Tobe for a much-needed break from their busy lives in New York. But when a simple fishing accident leads the foursome to follow an unexplored shortcut through the woods, the lives of this small group of friends are shattered forever as they suddenly find themselves facing the shocking and terrible curse of one of America's most haunted places. Written by Michael Penning
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a heterosexual romantic pairing between Kayla and Dean. There is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or narratives that challenge heteronormativity.
Gender Representation
The story features two women and two men within a survivalist framework. While women are central to the plot, the film relies on traditional gender roles common in thriller scenarios.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The narrative context suggests a homogeneous group of characters returning from New York. There is no specific evidence of race-bent casting or a non-Anglo-Saxon majority.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot utilizes the isolated wilderness trope to contrast urban life with rural superstition. It follows a standard cautionary tale structure without critiquing Western institutions.
Disability Representation
The synopsis contains no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No representation is present in this category.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
The film operates as a conventional horror piece that adheres strictly to established genre tropes. It relies on themes of isolation and curses rather than exploring intersectional identities or social hierarchies. The narrative structure is centered on a small, seemingly homogeneous group of friends. This focus results in a lack of diversity across racial, LGBTQ+, and disability categories. Ultimately, the work functions within standard cinematic expectations for the era, prioritizing survivalist tension over the subversion of traditional demographic patterns.

2018

2008

2021

2013

2011

2006

2012

2005

2009

2013

2010

2017
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.