You are here:

Jealousy

Jealousy

Representation Score

1.5/10

Minimal

1991

R

Director

Kathleen Fonmarty

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film centers on traditional romantic archetypes and interpersonal conflicts, focusing on individual psychological games rather than broader social issues. It relies on established clichés such as the womanizing male lead and the emotionally vulnerable female protagonist. This structure prioritizes narrow perspectives and adheres to standard social structures. The lack of representation for diverse identities, disabilities, or neurodivergent characters limits the narrative scope.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Jealousy have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The story focuses on heterosexual relationships and power struggles between a man and a woman. There are no queer subtexts or non-cisgender identities represented.

How does Jealousy portray gender?

Limited

The film reinforces traditional gender roles where the female character is submissive and the male character is dominant. The male protagonist drives the plot while the female lead responds to his actions.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Jealousy?

Minimal

The narrative does not provide any information about the racial identities of the characters. There is no mention of a diverse cast or multi-layered dynamics.

How does Jealousy represent religion and culture?

Fair

The film explores individual ethics and moral ambiguity within a romantic context. It does not challenge Western institutional norms or prioritize specific cultural critiques.

Does Jealousy include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no indication of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No neurodivergent representation is present in the story.

Present on Screen

  • The film offers a focused exploration of individual interpersonal ethics and moral ambiguity.
  • It provides a character-driven study of romantic instability and subjective morality.

Limited or Absent

  • The narrative relies on the cliché of female passivity and submissive love.
  • The story lacks multi-layered complexity and fails to challenge traditional social norms.
  • There is a complete absence of LGBTQ+ representation or neurodivergent characters.

Official Synopsis

Pierre is a womanizing photographer, with a slight mean streak. For whatever reason, Camille, an artist in her own right, finds him entrancing and easily succumbs to his devious efforts to get her into bed. Soon she is trying to hold him to her with her oh-so submissive love, and he is playing some games with her head by pretending (usually) to have been playing around with others. Eventually, he encounters another woman who is not so sticky and tells her to buzz off. When they meet some time later, it becomes clear that the relationship meant different things to each of them.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.