
If These Walls Could Talk
1996

Representation Score
Good
1989
Director
Gregory Hoblit
Runtime
100 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetNew Showbiz Analysis
Roe vs. Wade is a procedural drama that effectively challenges traditional gender hierarchies by focusing on a woman's fight for autonomy within a male-dominated legal system. However, the film lacks breadth in other areas of identity, such as LGBTQ+ representation and disability. Its strength lies in its critique of religious-based legal structures, prioritizing secular legalism and individual rights over state-mandated morality.
Category Breakdown
The film focuses on a legal struggle centered around reproductive rights, with no apparent LGBTQ+ characters or diverse gender identities in the main cast.
The narrative highlights a woman's struggle for bodily autonomy within a male-dominated legal system, emphasizing her central role in driving the story.
The film primarily features white characters and legal professionals, with ability to act largely confined to a white-centric framework.
It critiques traditional religious institutions by showing how religious dogma can act as a systemic barrier to personal liberties and individual privacy.
The film does not focus on visible or invisible disabilities. Character struggles are defined by socioeconomic status and legal standing rather than neurodivergence or physical disabilities.
Present on Screen
Limited or Absent
Official Synopsis
Holly Hunter plays a lonely, single, poorly educated Texan who finds herself pregnant with no means to support a child. To avoid giving up the child, she seeks an abortion. Denied an abortion in Texas the young woman hires a novice lawyer to plead her case in the US supreme court. Eventually the law is changed, but for the character it takes longer than nine months.

1996

2022

1995

1987

1994

2021

2012

1989
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.