You are here:

I Am My Own Laboratory

I Am My Own Laboratory

Representation Score

5.6/10

Fair

2018

PG-13

Director

Oliver Hockenhull

Runtime

43 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

I Am My Own Laboratory is a biographical study of radical autonomy. It successfully challenges traditional gender hierarchies by positioning a woman as a key figure in scientific discovery and intellectual leadership. However, the film's scope is limited, focusing on a specific British aristocratic history that lacks racial and ethnic diversity. The narrative remains centered on a homogeneous social background. Ultimately, the work excels at challenging institutional authority and medical gatekeeping. However, it lacks breadth in LGBTQ+ and racial representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does I Am My Own Laboratory have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or stories about non-cisgender identities. It focuses solely on the life of the main subject.

How does I Am My Own Laboratory portray gender?

Good

The documentary highlights the strong role of a woman who defies medical norms to lead scientific research. This challenges traditional male-dominated intellectual hierarchies.

How racially and ethnically diverse is I Am My Own Laboratory?

Limited

The story centers on a specific British aristocrat and her personal history, creating a homogeneous social context that lacks diverse racial or ethnic representation.

How does I Am My Own Laboratory represent religion and culture?

Excellent

The film emphasizes subjective experiences over institutional norms, presenting a critique of Western medical dominance through the lens of psychedelic research.

Does I Am My Own Laboratory include disability representation?

Fair

The film examines altered states of consciousness and neurodivergence through the lens of ability to act. Feilding’s self-experimentation is portrayed as reclaiming bodily and mental autonomy.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender hierarchies in scientific leadership.
  • Powerful portrayal of women's ability to drive the story and intellectual autonomy.
  • Effective critique of established medical and scientific institutions.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks diverse racial and ethnic representation.
  • No LGBTQ+ representation or perspectives on non-cisgender identities.
  • Focuses narrowly on a specific aristocratic context.

Official Synopsis

In the early 1970’s, 23 year old Amanda Feilding, Countess of Wemyss and March, drilled a hole in her head — that is she trepanned herself. Now 74, Amanda is a leader of the renaissance in scientific psychedelic research.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.