Appetites
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.1 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
Slasher.com
2017
RDirector
Chip Gubera
Runtime
89 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
After meeting online, Jack and Kristy go on a weekend getaway to the woodlands of rural Missouri. While discovering each other, they soon learn of the terrorizing horrors that the forest has in store.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
1.5/10
Minimal
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film focuses on a conventional romantic pairing between Jack and Kristy. There is no evidence of queer subtext or non-cisnormative identities.
Gender Representation
The story utilizes a standard dual-protagonist structure. While the characters discover each other, the film remains within the bounds of traditional genre tropes.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The documentation does not indicate a diverse cast or race-bent casting. The rural Missouri setting suggests a departure from homogeneous casting norms is unlikely.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative adheres to standard horror conventions rather than challenging systemic structures. It lacks any visible anti-capitalist or secularist critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters possessing visible or invisible disabilities. Neurodivergent representation is absent from the character profiles.
Strengths
- The film utilizes a clear dual-protagonist structure through the characters of Jack and Kristy.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative lacks demographic breadth and fails to engage with intersectional themes.
- The film relies on homogeneous casting and traditional genre tropes rather than subverting them.
- There is a notable absence of representation for disability, race, and LGBTQ+ identities.
AI Analysis
Slasher.com operates as a conventional horror piece that relies heavily on established genre tropes. The narrative centers on a standard romantic pairing in a rural setting, offering little in the way of demographic breadth or intersectional complexity. The film lacks documented representation across most key identity vectors, including race, disability, and LGBTQ+ identities. This reliance on traditional thriller frameworks results in a story that does not actively disrupt social hierarchies or engage with systemic critiques. Ultimately, the production functions as a straightforward survivalist tale. It prioritizes genre-standard tension over the narrative depth required to explore diverse human experiences.
Similar Movies
Bleed
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.1 out of 10
Blood Hunt
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.9 out of 10
Playing with Dolls: Havoc
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.5 out of 10
Devil in the Dark
2017
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Village in the Woods
2021
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.0 out of 10
Road Games
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.7 out of 10
The Culling
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
The Final Terror
1983
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.7 out of 10
Moonstalker
1989
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.3 out of 10
Boggy Creek
2010
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.8 out of 10
Bone Breaker
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 2.2 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.