You are here:
Michael Jackson: Dangerous - The Short Films

Michael Jackson: Dangerous - The Short Films

1993

Director

Billy DiCicco, David Fincher, Michael Jackson, David Lynch, John Landis, John Singleton, Herb Ritts, Joe Pytka, David Kellogg, Andrew Morahan, Vince Patterson

Runtime

112 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Michael Jackson's Dangerous album once again rocketed the global superstar to mega-platinum success! "Dangerous - The Short Films" captures the visual and musical highlights of his most recent string of hit singles. As well as extensive behind the scenes profiles of the making of Michael's state of the art short films.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.9/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Fair

The films focus on heteronormative romantic tensions and stylized courtship. While the surrealist style allows for fluid interpretations, there is a lack of explicit queer coding or non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Women often occupy traditional cinematic archetypes, such as the femme fatale in 'Give In to Me.' They serve as romantic interests or mysterious figures rather than disrupting established gender hierarchies.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

The anthology excels by deconstructing racial boundaries through visual technology. 'Black or White' uses morphing to dissolve ethnic distinctions, while 'Jam' utilizes diverse, urban casting to challenge Anglo-centric norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The collection explores communal spirituality and social isolation. 'Will You Be There' offers a spiritual exploration of religious gathering, prioritizing universal themes over specific dogmatic focuses.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of physical or neurodivergent disabilities used as central character traits or plot devices within the films.

Strengths

  • Exceptional deconstruction of racial boundaries through innovative visual technology.
  • A diverse, high-pedigree creative team that brings multifaceted perspectives.
  • Effective use of urban casting to promote a global, multi-ethnic narrative.

Areas for Improvement

  • Reliance on traditional gender archetypes and the femme fatale trope.
  • Lack of explicit representation for LGBTQ+ identities or queer coding.
  • Absence of characters representing physical or neurodivergent disabilities.

AI Analysis

This anthology is a landmark of visual storytelling that uses high-concept technology to dismantle racial hierarchies. The use of morphing effects in 'Black or White' serves as a powerful metaphor for the fluidity of identity and the artificiality of racial categories. However, the collection remains tethered to traditional cinematic frameworks regarding gender and sexuality. Women are frequently cast in archetypal roles, and the romantic narratives lean heavily toward heteronormative structures. Ultimately, the work succeeds as a postmodern exploration of identity. It prioritizes a multi-ethnic, global perspective that challenges conventional social boundaries through its visionary direction and diverse casting.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.