Romantically Speaking
2015
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.6 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
A Man For Every Month
2017
PGDirector
Ron Oliver
Runtime
83 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
An shy writer has to go out on a date with a different man every month in order to write an article for her company's 'Man for Every Month' blog.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
3.6/10
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film centers on a female protagonist dating various men for a professional project. There is no evidence of queer themes or non-heteronormative character arcs.
Gender Representation
A female writer holds professional agency, providing moderate competence. However, the plot relies on traditional romantic structures rather than subverting gendered power dynamics.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The episodic premise allows for a rotating cast of men, but there is no explicit evidence of intentional intersectional casting or diverse character depth.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The story operates within standard Western romantic comedy conventions. It aligns with conventional social norms rather than critiquing religion or traditional family structures.
Disability Representation
The narrative contains no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
Strengths
- The premise provides a structured opportunity to introduce a wide variety of male characters.
- The female protagonist is positioned with professional agency as a writer and journalist.
Areas for Improvement
- The narrative relies on traditional romantic tropes rather than subverting gendered power dynamics.
- There is a lack of evidence regarding intentional intersectional casting or diverse character depth.
- The film lacks representation of LGBTQ+ themes or characters with disabilities.
AI Analysis
A Man For Every Month follows a conventional romantic comedy framework. The plot uses a professional obligation—writing a blog—as a vehicle for a series of romantic encounters. This structure prioritizes established genre tropes over the disruption of social hierarchies. While the premise offers a rotating cast of male characters, the film lacks evidence of deliberate intersectional storytelling. It functions as a standard, character-driven broadcast television movie designed for accessibility. Ultimately, the film adheres to traditional narrative architectures. It focuses on romantic tropes rather than deconstructing systemic social or gendered power dynamics.
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.