You are here:

Crush

Crush

Representation Score

7.1/10

Good

2009

Director

Pyotr Buslov, Boris Khlebnikov, Kirill Serebrennikov, Ivan Vyrypaev, Aleksei German Jr.

Runtime

95 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Crush is a postmodern collection of stories that explore human connections and existential questions in Moscow. It successfully challenges traditional romantic and heroic clichés by emphasizing emotional vulnerability. The film's strength lies in its moral relativism and its portrayal of social detachment as a realistic response to a post-Soviet reality. However, it remains limited by its focus on a homogeneous demographic, lacking significant LGBTQ+ visibility or diverse ethnic representation.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Crush have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The film focuses on the psychological tension in romantic relationships rather than explicitly showing LGBTQ+ identities. While it avoids traditional stereotypes about straight relationships, the absence of clear LGBTQ+ characters limits its representation.

How does Crush portray gender?

Good

The movie explores the vulnerability and emotional struggles of men, moving away from traditional masculine dominance. It highlights the internal emotional lives of both men and women.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Crush?

Limited

The film centers on the urban youth of Moscow, featuring a mostly homogeneous cast. It does not use diverse ethnic casting to challenge societal norms.

How does Crush represent religion and culture?

Good

The film adopts a secular viewpoint, critiquing traditional social structures and heroism as outdated in the face of modern alienation. It portrays these elements as irrelevant in contemporary life.

Does Crush include disability representation?

Fair

A psychiatric patient is featured prominently, providing insight into mental health issues. However, the character often embodies existential loneliness rather than having a strong personal ability to act.

Present on Screen

  • Challenges traditional gender roles by depicting men with emotional vulnerability.
  • Provides a nuanced, secular critique of traditional social and religious structures.
  • Avoids clichéd romantic clichés by focusing on the fragility and fluidity of human connections.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks clear LGBTQ+ representation and non-cisgender gender expressions in main characters.
  • Features a predominantly homogeneous cast with little racial or ethnic diversity.
  • Uses mental health primarily as a narrative device for existential themes rather than character empowerment.

Official Synopsis

Five short love stories, which become a statement of the directors about love. A shoemaker, a reporter, a pavement hooker-in, a psychiatric patient and a young man released from prison are the main characters of the film, heroes in a time of no heroes. All of them have the important qualities of being openhearted and not afraid of loving.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.