You are here:

Storks

Storks

Representation Score

6.4/10

Good

2016

PG

Director

Doug Sweetland, Nicholas Stoller

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Storks operates as a transitional narrative that prioritizes systemic critique over identity politics. While it lacks meaningful engagement with LGBTQ+ or disability representation, it finds progressive footing through its subversion of gender roles and its commentary on modern institutions. The film's primary strength is its deconstruction of the 'efficiency-at-all-costs' mindset. By framing the Cornerstone Delivery corporation as a soulless entity, the story highlights the dehumanizing effects of extreme corporate efficiency. However, the reliance on animal archetypes and a narrow focus on the protagonists' journey prevent a broader exploration of racial and ethnic diversity or diverse lived experiences.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Storks have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

There are no LGBTQ+ characters or narratives that challenge traditional social norms. The film follows a conventional framework that assumes everyone is straight or cisgender.

How does Storks portray gender?

Good

Tulip subverts typical gender roles by being a proactive and highly capable driver of the plot. She avoids the damsel in distress cliché by contributing essential problem-solving skills.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Storks?

Limited

The use of anthropomorphic avian characters limits the visibility of human racial diversity. These animal archetypes do not offer nuanced representations of ethnic or racial identity.

How does Storks represent religion and culture?

Good

The story critiques hyper-capitalist structures by positioning the pursuit of corporate profit against the need for meaningful, human-centric connections.

Does Storks include disability representation?

Limited

The narrative lacks characters with visible or invisible disabilities. The focus remains on the protagonists' logistical and emotional journey rather than exploring neurodivergence or physical disability.

Present on Screen

  • Tulip provides a strong subversion of gender roles, acting as a proactive leader rather than a passive character.
  • The film offers a sharp, sophisticated critique of hyper-capitalism and the dehumanizing nature of corporate efficiency.

Limited or Absent

  • The film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities and characters with visible or invisible disabilities.
  • The use of avian characters limits the opportunity for nuanced racial and ethnic diversity.

Official Synopsis

Storks deliver babies…or at least they used to. Now they deliver packages for a global internet retail giant. Junior, the company’s top delivery stork, is about to be promoted when he accidentally activates the Baby Making Machine, producing an adorable and wholly unauthorized baby girl...

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.