You are here:
High Society

High Society

2018

Director

Byun Hyuk

Runtime

119 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The story of the journey of married couple up the social latter. The husband is professor at Seoul National University who is running for the National Assembly, and his wife is a painter.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.0/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The story focuses strictly on heteronormative marriage and political lineage.

Gender Representation

Good

The narrative subverts traditional hierarchies by centering a woman's agency and intellectual drive. The female protagonist challenges conventional domestic roles by pursuing power in a male-dominated sphere.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast is predominantly Korean, maintaining cultural authenticity to its specific socioeconomic setting. It does not utilize multicultural blending or race-bending.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques institutional corruption and the moral vacuum of extreme capitalism. It portrays political and family pillars as susceptible to manipulation for status.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities within the narrative.

Strengths

  • Subverts traditional gender hierarchies by centering female agency and ambition.
  • Provides a sharp critique of institutional corruption and moral relativism.
  • Maintains high cultural authenticity within its specific South Korean socioeconomic context.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities and non-cisnormative gender identities.
  • Provides no discernible representation of physical, sensory, or neurodivergent disabilities.
  • Focuses narrowly on a specific socioeconomic class, limiting intersectional depth.

AI Analysis

High Society is a character-driven drama that succeeds primarily through its subversion of gendered power dynamics. By positioning the female lead as the primary architect of the couple's social ascent, the film avoids the trope of the submissive spouse. However, the film's impact is constrained by a narrow focus on a specific socioeconomic class. The lack of intersectional representation regarding LGBTQ+ identities or disability limits the scope of its social commentary. Ultimately, the film serves more as an institutional critique of political and capitalist corruption than a broad study of diverse human experiences.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.