You are here:
Wrong Cops

Wrong Cops

2013

NR

Director

Quentin Dupieux

Runtime

83 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A group of bad cops look to dispose of a body that one of them accidentally shot.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.4/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks narratives centered on queer themes or non-cisnormative identities. The focus remains strictly on the absurdist interactions between male protagonists without engaging with LGBTQ+ identities.

Gender Representation

Limited

The character economy is heavily skewed toward a male-centric perspective. The narrative does not provide significant female agency or subvert gender hierarchies through empowered female characters.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film operates within a localized urban setting that does not prioritize intersectional racial blending. The focus stays on individual absurdity rather than exploring racial or ethnic identity.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film excels by subverting traditional Western institutional respect. It portrays law enforcement as incompetent and random, disrupting conventional expectations of authority and social order.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no significant representation of neurodivergent or physical disabilities. Erratic character behaviors are framed as surrealist comedy rather than explorations of disability or neurodiversity.

Strengths

  • Successfully deconstructs institutional authority and the concept of professional decorum.
  • Embraces postmodern, non-linear social dynamics and moral relativism.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks meaningful representation of female characters and gender agency.
  • Fails to include diverse LGBTQ+ narratives or non-cisnormative identities.
  • Does not prioritize intersectional racial blending or ethnic identity exploration.

AI Analysis

Wrong Cops is a postmodern deconstruction of the crime genre that prioritizes surrealism over traditional procedural structures. While it succeeds in its cultural critique of institutional authority, it lacks demographic breadth across most other categories. The film's strength lies in its subversion of social order, using the incompetence of its protagonists to challenge systemic reliability. However, this focus comes at the expense of diverse representation. Ultimately, the narrative is a narrow, male-centric exploration of absurdity. It fails to engage with gender, racial, or LGBTQ+ identities, resulting in a score that reflects a lack of intentional inclusion.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.