You are here:
Look at These Young People!

Look at These Young People!

1969

Director

Rezo Chkheidze

Runtime

100 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

Film school desk akhladaprenil guys from Tbilisi in the early days of World War II soldier's overcoat to put on, temporarily put aside their dreams, loved ones and fire parted ways scattered. Thus began a new phase of their lives, gantsdebita and misery. Yesterday's long-suffering smile in front of the boys grow up into fighters.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.1/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film lacks explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy. The narrative focuses on male friendships and romantic ties disrupted by war.

Gender Representation

Fair

Plot agency is concentrated among male protagonists transitioning into soldiers. While female cast members appear, the story leans toward traditional mid-century masculine roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The film offers a localized perspective centered on Georgian identity in Tbilisi. While it provides a non-Western lens, the cast remains ethnically homogeneous.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative disrupts heroic wartime tropes by portraying the misery and scattering of dreams. It offers a nuanced, fatalistic view of how institutions impact individuals.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities driving the narrative or serving as central plot devices.

Strengths

  • Provides a vital non-Western perspective by centering on Georgian identity and the cultural milieu of Tbilisi.
  • Avoids standard heroic wartime tropes in favor of a nuanced, humanistic exploration of individual misery.
  • Prioritizes personal agency and emotional landscapes over rigid, state-mandated cinematic archetypes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks visible representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
  • Concentrates primary plot agency on male protagonists, reinforcing conventional mid-century gender roles.
  • Features an ethnically homogeneous cast within its specific regional context.

AI Analysis

Rezo Chkheidze’s film serves as a humanistic historical document that prioritizes individual emotional landscapes over rigid state-mandated archetypes. By focusing on the transition of film students into soldiers, the story explores the loss of innocence and the fragmentation of personal connections during World War II. While the film provides a valuable non-Western perspective by centering on Georgian culture, it lacks the intersectional complexity of modern cinema. The narrative is largely defined by traditional gender roles and a homogeneous cast, reflecting the specific social context of 1969. Ultimately, the work succeeds in deconstructing idealized patriotic tropes. It replaces standard wartime hagiography with a more personal, nuanced look at how global conflict destroys the dreams of youth.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.