You are here:

David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived

David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived

Representation Score

7.7/10

Good

2023

Director

Dan Hartley

Runtime

89 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The documentary succeeds by subverting the typical tragedy cliché often associated with biographical films. Instead of focusing on loss, the narrative centers on David Holmes's personal autonomy and his refusal to be defined by his paralysis. While the film lacks breadth in terms of racial, gender, or LGBTQ+ diversity, it offers a sophisticated and progressive portrayal of disability. It frames the protagonist's life as a site of continued exploration rather than a state of victimhood. Ultimately, the film's impact relies on its ability to draw parallels between the resilience of the Harry Potter mythos and the lived reality of a stunt performer navigating life after a catastrophic accident.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived have LGBTQ+ representation?

Fair

The documentary provides no explicit evidence regarding LGBTQ+ identities. The score reflects a neutral baseline for a biographical study where these themes are not the primary focus.

How does David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived portray gender?

Fair

The film centers on a male protagonist. It avoids traditional masculine stoicism by highlighting the importance of vulnerability and adapting to major physical changes.

How racially and ethnically diverse is David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived?

Fair

The narrative focuses on a specific individual's biography within a professional stunt context. There is no indication of a diverse cast or intentional racial subversion.

How does David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived represent religion and culture?

Good

The film emphasizes individual ability to act over systemic narratives. It implicitly critiques the fragility of professional structures while celebrating the ability to find meaning outside traditional productivity.

Does David Holmes: The Boy Who Lived include disability representation?

Excellent

This is the film's primary strength. It avoids 'inspiration porn' by centering on Holmes's ability to act and his determination to seek adventure despite his paralysis.

Present on Screen

  • Exceptional disability representation that avoids 'inspiration porn' clichés.
  • Focuses on the protagonist's ability to drive the story and autonomy rather than passive victimhood.
  • Subverts traditional masculine stoicism by embracing vulnerability.

Limited or Absent

  • Lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or narratives.
  • Limited evidence of racial or ethnic diversity within the cast.
  • Narrow focus on a single individual's biography limits broader multi-layered scope.

Official Synopsis

As Daniel Radcliffe's stunt double in the Harry Potter films, David Holmes' work has been seen worldwide by millions of people. Tragically an on-set accident ended what David calls "the best job in the world," leaving him paralyzed. Like the on-screen character he helped bring to life, David is determined to continue seeking adventure and living life to the fullest despite mounting obstacles.

How are these scores produced? →

Where to Watch

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.