You are here:

Boomerang

Name: Boomerang
Director: Pyotr Buslov
Released: 2021
Duration: 105 min

Representation Score

5.4/10

Fair

2021

Director

Pyotr Buslov

Runtime

105 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Boomerang primarily explores the tension between the wealthy pharmaceutical elite and the disenfranchised creative class. The narrative emphasizes class-based conflict over identity-based representation, presenting a cynical view of social standing. While the film effectively challenges the 'successful businessman' cliché by highlighting the volatility of wealth, it lacks depth in addressing a diverse range of human experiences. Its strength lies in critiquing economic stability and moral relativism, but it remains confined to a narrow demographic focus and relies heavily on male-centric archetypes.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Boomerang have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or themes. The main conflict revolves around socioeconomic issues rather than non-straight relationships.

How does Boomerang portray gender?

Fair

The story focuses on male characters and their power struggles, while female characters have little influence on the main conflict. Traditional male leadership is challenged, but female influence is largely absent.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Boomerang?

Limited

The film centers on a specific urban environment and its internal social divisions. It does not feature a diverse cast representing multiple ethnicities.

How does Boomerang represent religion and culture?

Good

The film criticizes capitalist systems by portraying the wealthy protagonist's actions as exploitative. It highlights the struggle between the 'master' and the 'miserable' to dismantle social hierarchies.

Does Boomerang include disability representation?

Limited

Petrovich's mental health crisis serves mainly as a plot device. The narrative uses psychological distress without delving deeply into neurodivergence or giving it genuine importance.

Present on Screen

Provides a sharp critique of traditional capitalist structures and the 'benevolent businessman' cliché.
Explores complex social hierarchies through the tension between different socioeconomic classes.
Offers a nuanced look at the instability of wealth and the precariousness of the creative class.

Limited or Absent

Lacks meaningful representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight themes.
Fails to provide significant influence or presence for female characters within the central conflict.
Uses mental health crises as a mere narrative device rather than exploring disability with depth.

Official Synopsis

A wealthy pharmaceutical business owner, Edik is used to managing and controlling. But fate brings him an unexpected surprise. The unemployed artist Petrovich, who decided to say goodbye to life, falls from the roof of a skyscraper onto a brand new expensive businessman’s car. Is the miserable life of a loser worth that kind of money? Moreover, he will never be able to return them. But debt must be received at all costs, for Edik it is a matter of principle, forgiving others is not in his rules. Edik decides that Petrovich will work for him for free, he has every right to do so, because he is a real master of life. Or does he only think so, and everything can change at any second and turn over exactly the opposite?

How are these scores produced? →