You are here:
Slay the Dragon

Slay the Dragon

2019

PG-13

Director

Chris Durrance, Barak Goodman

Runtime

101 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

It influences elections and sways outcomes -- gerrymandering has become a hot-button political topic and symbol for everything broken about the American electoral process. But there are those on the front lines fighting to change the system.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

6.1/10

Good


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film does not feature LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. The focus remains strictly on the mechanics of gerrymandering and electoral reform.

Gender Representation

Fair

Gender representation sits at a neutral baseline. It is unclear if the activists profiled disrupt or reinforce traditional gender hierarchies within the political landscape.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The narrative likely explores racial equity through the lens of voting rights. It addresses how broken electoral processes impact disenfranchised minority voting blocs.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The documentary engages deeply with institutional critique. It frames existing political structures as flawed, prioritizing the deconstruction of established Western power dynamics.

Disability Representation

Minimal

There is no evidence of neurodivergence or physical disabilities being central to the film. No significant character elements regarding disability are present.

Strengths

  • Strong thematic focus on challenging broken political institutions.
  • Directly addresses the systemic disenfranchisement of minority voting blocs.
  • Provides a critical framework for examining established power dynamics.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks specific evidence regarding the gender distribution of profiled activists.
  • Does not explicitly detail the racial makeup of the subjects featured.
  • Provides no representation for LGBTQ+ or disability-focused narratives.

AI Analysis

Slay the Dragon functions as a systemic critique of the American electoral process. Its strength lies in its thematic commitment to challenging established political structures and the corruption inherent in gerrymandering. While the film addresses the disenfranchisement of minority groups, specific demographic data for the cast is not provided. This creates a gap between the film's progressive themes and its verifiable representation. Ultimately, the documentary's value is found in its institutional deconstruction. It moves beyond simple reporting to examine how systemic inequities shape modern democracy.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.