You are here:
Tarzan II

Tarzan II

2005

G

Director

Brian Smith

Runtime

72 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

When one of his missteps puts his family in jeopardy, Tarzan decides they would be better off without him.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

2.5/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film adheres to strict heteronormative standards. The central romance between Tarzan and Jane follows a traditional lens without any presence of non-cisnormative identities.

Gender Representation

Fair

Jane is portrayed as an intellectual explorer with specialized scientific knowledge. While she possesses agency, the narrative remains anchored in a collaborative partnership model rather than dismantling gender roles.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Limited

The jungle setting relies on anthropomorphic animals to drive the plot. Consequently, the story lacks significant human racial diversity or casting that challenges historical norms.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Limited

Themes focus on the preservation of the nuclear family and Western values of parental guidance. The story operates within a standard moral framework of responsibility and belonging.

Disability Representation

Minimal

Characters are defined by the physical competence required for jungle survival. There is no discernible representation of neurodivergent or physically disabled characters with narrative agency.

Strengths

  • Jane is depicted as an intellectual explorer with specialized scientific agency.
  • The film provides competent characterization for its primary leads.

Areas for Improvement

  • The narrative lacks representation of non-cisnormative identities or LGBTQ+ characters.
  • There is no visible or invisible disability representation within the character arcs.
  • The story lacks significant human racial diversity or intersectional identities.

AI Analysis

Tarzan II functions as a conventional family adventure that prioritizes established character archetypes. While the leads are competent, the film lacks the intentionality needed to engage with complex intersectional identities or disrupt traditional social hierarchies. The narrative relies heavily on the biological bonds of the animal kingdom. This focus shifts attention away from human racial or cultural diversity, resulting in a story that feels geographically specific but socially narrow.

How are these scores produced? →

Similar Movies

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.