You are here:
Around the World in 80 Ways

Around the World in 80 Ways

1969

X

Director

Tommy Goetz

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A group of rich middle-aged stockbrokers get bored with making millions in the stock market. They come up with the idea to form an international sex club, hiring only the most beautiful women and the studliest men, and then organize a massive orgy.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

4.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Limited

The film focuses on a gender-segregated recruitment process for an organized orgy. While it departs from monogamous norms, there is no evidence of non-cisnormative identities or same-sex intimacy.

Gender Representation

Fair

The story subverts the 'stable provider' trope by showing successful men driven by impulse. However, it relies on conventional aesthetics that objectify women as commodities.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

The narrative centers on wealthy stockbrokers and conventional beauty standards. It appears to default to the homogeneous, Anglo-Saxon demographics typical of 1960s high-finance depictions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film critiques Western capitalist structures by framing extreme wealth as a source of boredom. It prioritizes hedonistic liberation over traditional religious or familial sanctity.

Disability Representation

Minimal

The film provides no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities.

Strengths

  • Offers a critique of Western capitalist structures and the emptiness of wealth.
  • Challenges traditional social decorum and religious institutions through hedonistic themes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Relies on highly conventionalized and objectifying gendered aesthetics.
  • Lacks racial diversity, defaulting to homogeneous demographic archetypes.
  • Provides no evidence of LGBTQ+ representation or non-cisnormative identities.

AI Analysis

Around the World in 80 Ways functions as a period-specific exploitation drama that uses transgressive themes to challenge mid-century social decorum. It offers a critique of the emptiness found in capitalist success, prioritizing subjective morality over traditional industriousness. However, the film lacks intersectional depth. Its focus on wealth and specific beauty standards suggests a reliance on exclusionary archetypes. While it disrupts social institutions, it does not expand the scope of identity-based representation. Ultimately, the work is more a study of bourgeois boredom and hedonism than a diverse exploration of human identity.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.