Impractical Jokers: Hollywood
2020
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 4.1 out of 10
You are here:
Find another title
Type to search for movies. Use arrow keys to navigate suggestions, Enter to select, Escape to close.
The Jerk, Too
1984
TV-PGDirector
Michael Schultz
Runtime
92 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Navin Johnson heads to Los Angeles to attend the wedding of his pen pal, Marie. On the way, he runs across a gang of hobos whose leader, Diesel, takes him to Las Vegas after learning of his skills at poker.
Where to Watch
Diversity & Representation
Overall Score
4.4/10
Fair
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film lacks any evidence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives addressing non-cisnormative identities. No queer representation is present in the story.
Gender Representation
The plot centers on a male protagonist's journey toward a romantic connection. While female characters like Marie exist, their agency remains unexamined.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The film maintains a focus on Black agency through Navin Johnson. It places the protagonist within diverse urban environments and marginalized subcultures.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The narrative explores tensions between different social strata, contrasting transient lifestyles with capitalist environments. It examines success through unconventional, non-institutional means.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with physical, sensory, or neurodivergent traits. The film provides no representation of disability.
Strengths
- Maintains a consistent focus on Black agency within a comedic structure.
- Explores social mobility by navigating diverse environments like Los Angeles and Las Vegas.
- Provides a critique of social stability through the lens of transient subcultures.
Areas for Improvement
- Lacks representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-cisnormative characters.
- Offers limited evidence of female agency or subversion of gender hierarchies.
- Provides no depiction of characters with physical or neurodivergent disabilities.
AI Analysis
The film functions as a character-driven odyssey that explores class mobility and social disruption. By moving Navin Johnson through disparate environments—from hobo gangs to the high-stakes landscape of Las Vegas—the story engages with the friction between different social strata. While the narrative succeeds in centering Black agency within a comedic framework, it lacks depth in other areas. The focus remains heavily on a traditional male-led journey, leaving little room for intersectional complexity or diverse identity exploration. Ultimately, the film's strength lies in its movement through non-traditional social groups rather than its engagement with gender or disability representation.
Similar Movies
Lucky Sunil
1988
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 5.0 out of 10
Tom, Dick and Harriet
2013
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Spring Fling!
1995
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
VIP
2008
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.2 out of 10
Spring Break Lawyer
2001
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.8 out of 10
Volltreffer
2016
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 3.0 out of 10
I Was a Mail Order Bride
1982
No user ratings available yet
Diversity score: 1.6 out of 10
Rate this Movie
Reviews
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.