You are here:

The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse

Name: The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse
Director: Anatole Litvak
Released: 1938
Duration: 87 min

Representation Score

3.6/10

Limited

1938

Approved

Director

Anatole Litvak

Runtime

87 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

The film presents a striking contrast between its limited demographic scope and its complex character development. While it fails to offer racial or LGBTQ+ diversity, it excels in presenting a sophisticated female lead who operates who play a significant role in driving the story. The narrative's strength lies in its subversion of 1930s gender norms and its exploration of situational ethics. However, the lack of characters who reflect more than one aspect of diversity and the homogeneous social setting keeps the overall score low.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse have LGBTQ+ representation?

Minimal

The film lacks any LGBTQ+ characters. Social dynamics remain focused on traditional romantic and power-based relationships of the 1930s.

How does The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse portray gender?

Good

Claudette Colbert's protagonist challenges the conventional gender roles as a highly intelligent and independent woman. She uses her intelligence and social skills to navigate male-dominated power structures, subverting the typical damsel-in-distress archetype.

How racially and ethnically diverse is The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse?

Minimal

The setting reflects the homogeneous, upper-class society of the era. There is no indication of racial blending or non-white majority casting within this glamorous, high-society environment.

How does The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse represent religion and culture?

Good

The narrative embraces moral relativism by framing criminal behavior as a means for intellectual pursuit. While it questions moral absolutes, it does not explicitly critique Western institutions.

Does The Amazing Dr. Clitterhouse include disability representation?

Minimal

There are no prominent depictions of visible or invisible disabilities within the character details provided.

Present on Screen

The protagonist offers a powerful subversion of the 'damsel in distress' archetype through her intellectual dominance.
The film explores sophisticated moral relativism rather than adhering to rigid, singular moralities.
women's ability to drive the story is prioritized, showing a character navigating power structures with strategic autonomy.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks racial and ethnic diversity, reflecting a very homogeneous upper-class demographic.
There is no representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-straight-centered social dynamics.
The narrative does not address disability or provide perspectives that reflect multiple aspects of identity.

Official Synopsis

A wealthy society doctor decides to research the medical aspects of criminal behaviour by becoming one himself. He joins a gang of thieves and proceeds to wrest leadership of the gang away from its extremely resentful leader.

How are these scores produced? →