New Showbiz

You are here:
57 Seconds

57 Seconds

2023

R

Director

Rusty Cundieff

Runtime

99 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

When a tech blogger lands an interview with a tech guru and stops an attack on him, he finds a mysterious ring that takes him back 57 seconds into the past.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.6/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film entirely lacks identifiable LGBTQ+ characters or narratives. Social dynamics rely on heteronormative bonds, with no engagement with queer theory or non-heteronormative identities within the story.

Gender Representation

Good

A strong female lead drives the plot with intellect and agency in a male-dominated tech sector. While this subverts traditional hierarchies, the narrative avoids deep exploration of intersectional gender dynamics or critiques of masculinity.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Excellent

A diverse cast including Black actors in leading roles challenges genre norms. The plot explicitly addresses racial disparities through pharmaceutical negligence, featuring characters of color with significant agency beyond stereotypes.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The film sharply critiques corporate capitalism and pharmaceutical corruption, framing institutions as oppressive. This aligns with progressive critiques of late-stage capitalism, challenging Western ideals of corporate benevolence and meritocracy.

Disability Representation

Fair

Addiction and painkiller abuse serve as plot devices for corporate malfeasance rather than nuanced disability explorations. Affected characters lack agency in their recovery, and the narrative avoids visible physical or neurodivergent representation.

Strengths

  • Strong female lead with agency drives the plot in a male-dominated tech thriller setting.
  • Diverse cast challenges white dominance norms in sci-fi, featuring Black actors in leading roles.
  • Sharp critique of corporate capitalism aligns with progressive social commentary themes.

Areas for Improvement

  • Complete absence of LGBTQ+ characters or narratives limits inclusive representation significantly.
  • Disability themes are reduced to plot devices, lacking nuanced exploration of chronic illness.
  • Superficial handling of disability prevents deep engagement with the internal experiences of affected individuals.

AI Analysis

57 Seconds leverages its diverse cast to challenge genre conventions, particularly in racial representation where Black actors hold significant narrative power. The female protagonist’s agency offers a refreshing subversion of gender roles in sci-fi thrillers. However, the film’s social commentary remains surface-level regarding disability and entirely absent regarding LGBTQ+ identities. The narrative’s strength lies in its critique of systemic corporate power, which resonates with progressive values. Yet, the handling of disability reduces suffering to a villainous plot device, lacking the depth required for higher scores. The absence of queer representation further limits the film’s inclusivity. Ultimately, the movie succeeds in centering marginalized voices against corrupt institutions but fails to provide comprehensive representation across all identity spectrums. The moderate score reflects this balance between meaningful racial and gender progress and significant gaps in other areas.

How are these scores produced? →

Featured in

  • Best Racial & Ethnic Representation in Film
  • Best Racial & Ethnic Representation of the 2020s
  • Best Religious & Cultural Representation in Film

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.