You are here:

Hayride 2

Name: Hayride 2
Director: Terron R. Parsons
Released: 2015
Duration: 92 min

2015

Director

Terron R. Parsons

Runtime

92 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

The end of one journey only marks the beginning of another as Detective Loomis returns to uncover the truth behind the Legend of Pitchfork.

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.1/10

Limited

Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film contains no evidence of queer narratives or non-cisnormative identities. The available story details do not suggest any LGBTQ+ character arcs.

Gender Representation

Limited

The narrative centers on a male protagonist, Detective Loomis, following a traditional structure. The roles and agency of female characters remain unconfirmed.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Minimal

There is no indication of diverse casting or high-agency characters of color. The synopsis provides no specific details regarding racial or ethnic representation.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story utilizes localized folklore through the Legend of Pitchfork. It leans on traditional genre tropes rather than exploring specific cultural or systemic critiques.

Disability Representation

Minimal

No characters with visible or invisible disabilities are identified. The documentation lacks any mention of disability-related representation.

Strengths

The film utilizes localized folklore and the 'Legend of Pitchfork' to build its horror atmosphere.

Areas for Improvement

The narrative lacks diverse character identities and intersectional representation.
The protagonist structure follows conventional gender archetypes without expanding the cast's demographic breadth.
There is no evidence of representation for disability or LGBTQ+ communities.

AI Analysis

Hayride 2 functions as a standard genre sequel that prioritizes its established horror mythos over narrative innovation. The plot follows a conventional procedural framework centered on a singular male protagonist investigating a local legend. The film lacks documented markers of intentional intersectional representation. It adheres to traditional thriller structures rather than attempting to deconstruct social hierarchies or introduce diverse perspectives. Ultimately, the work appears focused on genre-specific tropes. It does not provide evidence of progressive social commentary or the subversion of typical cinematic norms.

How are these scores produced? →