You are here:
When the Moon Was Full

When the Moon Was Full

2019

Director

Narges Abyar

Runtime

131 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

There is a story of a young girl from the south of Tehran who falls in love with a young city girl while the girl is forced to emigrate from Iran for some reason. Along the way, his brother accompanies him, but in the middle of the road, something happens to them ...

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

5.7/10

Fair


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisnormative identities. The narrative remains focused on the survival and social navigation of its protagonists within a traditionalist framework.

Gender Representation

Fair

The film critiques traditional gender hierarchies by showing how women and children suffer under communal judgment. It portrays the female experience as a struggle for autonomy against rigid social expectations.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Good

The story provides depth by portraying the Sistan and Baluchestan province. It avoids monolithic depictions, offering a complex look at regional identity and the realities of border life.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Good

The narrative critiques traditional institutions and folk superstitions as oppressive forces. It frames local authority and traditional beliefs as sources of social harm and isolation for the marginalized.

Disability Representation

Good

The film depicts physical disability as a central social reality rather than a plot device. It explores how disability intersects with superstition to create profound layers of isolation.

Strengths

  • Provides a nuanced and complex portrayal of the Sistan and Baluchestan province.
  • Avoids clichés by treating disability as a central, lived social reality.
  • Effectively critiques how folk superstitions and traditional hierarchies marginalize individuals.

Areas for Improvement

  • Lacks any explicit representation of LGBTQ+ characters or identities.
  • The narrative focus remains heavily centered within a traditionalist social framework.

AI Analysis

Narges Abyar’s film is a sophisticated sociological study that examines the friction between individual agency and entrenched traditionalism. It succeeds by centering on the intersection of disability, regional identity, and the critique of social hierarchies. The film's strength lies in its ethnographic depth and its refusal to treat disability as a mere source of inspiration. Instead, it treats physical difference as a lens through which to view systemic social stigma. However, the film lacks representation for LGBTQ+ identities. While it offers a powerful critique of patriarchal and superstitious structures, the narrative remains tethered to a traditionalist framework that excludes non-cisnormative perspectives.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.