You are here:

Time of the Eagle

Name: Time of the Eagle
Director: Bill Dial
Released: 1979
Duration: 90 min

Representation Score

1.9/10

Minimal

1979

Director

Bill Dial

Runtime

90 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

New Showbiz Analysis

Time of the Eagle is a product of late-70s exploitation cinema, prioritizing genre clichés over complex character development. The narrative structure leans heavily on historical archetypes and traditional action-horror conventions. The film lacks meaningful representation across most identity markers. It operates within a conventional framework that favors established power dynamics rather than challenging them or offering nuanced character development. Ultimately, the work serves as a period-typical genre piece. It focuses on a specific political conflict without addressing broader social or systemic complexities.

Watch this, not that →

Category Breakdown

Does Time of the Eagle have LGBTQ+ representation?

Limited

The film does not include any LGBTQ+ characters or non-cisgender identities. It follows the traditional assumption that everyone is straight or cisgender, which was common in 1979 action-horror cinema.

How does Time of the Eagle portray gender?

Limited

Gender roles likely follow the standard hierarchy typical of 1970s genre films. Male characters usually drive the action, while female characters often have secondary or decorative roles without much influence over the plot.

How racially and ethnically diverse is Time of the Eagle?

Fair

The South American setting suggests a mix of European and local populations. However, it is unclear if the film provides significant roles for non-white characters or if it relies on a homogeneous cast.

How does Time of the Eagle represent religion and culture?

Limited

The narrative focuses on extreme Nazi ideology within a traditional Western conflict framework. It functions more as a morality play than an exploration of systemic oppression or cultural relativism.

Does Time of the Eagle include disability representation?

Minimal

There is no documented evidence of characters with visible or invisible disabilities within the film.

Present on Screen

The South American setting provides a potential backdrop for diverse demographic intersections.

Limited or Absent

The film lacks LGBTQ+ representation and non-cisgender identities.
Gender roles appear to follow traditional, non-challenging hierarchies.
There is no evidence of diverse character's ability to drive the story or disability representation.
The cultural narrative lacks depth regarding systemic oppression or moral relativism.

Official Synopsis

A cinematic adventure into the world of Nazi refugees in South America during the late 70s.

How are these scores produced? →