
Séance
2006

2006
NRDirector
Cartney Wearn
Runtime
91 minutes
Average Rating
No ratings yetSynopsis
Looking for a night of thrills, eight friends roam the abandoned Royal Crescent Hotel, where five students were murdered more than 20 years ago. When they discover a severed hand, they conjure up a evil spirit and unleash its bloody wrath. To survive the night, the friends must solve a century-old mystery that threatens to annihilate them one by one.
Overall Score
Limited
Category Breakdown
LGBTQ+ Representation
The film follows a standard horror ensemble without explicit evidence of non-cisnormative identities. The narrative appears to rely on conventional, heteronormative social structures common in the thriller genre.
Gender Representation
The story lacks specific details regarding character agency or the subversion of traditional hierarchies. It appears to operate within standard genre expectations regarding survival and vulnerability.
Racial & Ethnic Diversity
The racial composition of the eight friends is not specified. The film lacks information regarding diverse casting, reflecting a baseline typical of mid-2000s genre cinema.
Religious & Cultural Diversity
The plot centers on a century-old mystery and supernatural spirits. The themes align with traditional moral frameworks rather than offering any subversive cultural or secularist critiques.
Disability Representation
There is no mention of characters with visible or invisible disabilities. No information is available regarding neurodivergence or physical disabilities within the ensemble.
Strengths
Areas for Improvement
AI Analysis
Pray for Morning functions as a traditional horror piece that adheres closely to established genre tropes. The narrative focuses on a group of friends facing a supernatural threat in an abandoned hotel, but it lacks the intersectional complexity needed to challenge social hierarchies. The film's structure appears to follow the standard production profiles of the mid-2000s, which often prioritized conventional storytelling over progressive representation. There is no evidence of intentional subversion regarding gender, race, or identity. Ultimately, the film lacks the specific character details or thematic depth required to move beyond a baseline genre experience. It remains a straightforward thriller without significant social or cultural critique.

2006

2011

2012

2014

1999

1998

2004

2012

2007

2006

2009

2014
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!
Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.