You are here:
Pokémon the Movie: The Power of Us

Pokémon the Movie: The Power of Us

2018

Not Rated

Director

Tetsuo Yajima

Runtime

98 minutes

Average Rating

No ratings yet

Synopsis

A young athlete whose running days might be behind her, a compulsive liar, a shy researcher, a bitter old woman, and a little girl with a big secret—the only thing they have in common is the annual Wind Festival in Fula City. The festival celebrates the Legendary Pokémon Lugia, who brings the wind that powers this seaside city. When a series of threats endangers not just the festival, but all the people and Pokémon of Fula City, it’ll take more than just Satoshi and Pikachu to save the day! Can everyone put aside their differences and work together—or will it all end in destruction?

Where to Watch

Diversity & Representation

Overall Score

3.7/10

Limited


Category Breakdown

LGBTQ+ Representation

Minimal

The film lacks explicit LGBTQ+ characters or explorations of non-heteronormative identities. It focuses instead on traditional bonds of friendship and the spiritual connection between humans and Pokémon.

Gender Representation

Fair

Female characters hold significant narrative agency, including a young athlete and a little girl. They are central to the plot rather than being peripheral or submissive figures.

Racial & Ethnic Diversity

Fair

The cast includes children from various socioeconomic backgrounds within a fictional setting. However, the character designs favor a universalist approach rather than specific, intersectional ethnic distinctions.

Religious & Cultural Diversity

Fair

The story centers on the Wind Festival and the mythos of Lugia to promote community cohesion. It emphasizes a harmonious, traditionalist view of nature and social order.

Disability Representation

Limited

There is no explicit focus on characters with physical or invisible disabilities. Personality archetypes like a shy researcher are used for genre storytelling rather than exploring neurodivergence.

Strengths

  • Female characters are granted significant agency and are central to the plot's progression.
  • The ensemble provides a balanced representation of different age demographics and socioeconomic backgrounds.
  • The narrative successfully emphasizes themes of empathy and cross-species connection.

Areas for Improvement

  • The film lacks explicit representation of LGBTQ+ identities or non-heteronormative characters.
  • Character designs favor universalism over specific, intersectional racial and ethnic identities.
  • There is a lack of nuanced exploration regarding neurodivergence or physical disabilities.

AI Analysis

The film functions as a character-driven ensemble piece that prioritizes empathy and cooperation. It uses a multi-perspective structure to show how different social identities intersect during a crisis, though it remains within established genre conventions. While the movie provides a balanced ensemble and avoids submissive femininity, it lacks the intentionality to challenge systemic norms. The narrative leans into a stable, benevolent social order rather than deconstructing authority or traditional morality. Ultimately, the work emphasizes community cohesion and the bond between species. It succeeds as a conventional adventure but misses opportunities to engage with complex identity politics or specific marginalized experiences.

How are these scores produced? →

Rate this Movie

No rating selected
Use arrow keys to select a rating from 1 to 5 stars
Optional text review, maximum 2000 characters
Tip: Wrap spoilers with ||double pipes|| to hide them
0/2000 characters
You must be signed in to submit a rating

Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts on this movie!

Use the rating form above to leave a star rating and optional review.